Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess (Cornell Studies in Political Economy) - Book reviews of Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess (Cornell Studies in Political Economy)

'Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess (Cornell Studies in Political Economy)' book reviews

Review for'Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess (Cornell Studies in Political Economy)'

"Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess" by Ditlev R. Dahl and Carl Dahlström is a thought-provoking addition to the Cornell Studies in Political Economy series. The book challenges the long-held perception of Nordic countries as paragons of effective governance and social democracy. Instead, it delves into the complexities and unintended consequences that arise when adaptability and flexibility in governance go too far.

The authors meticulously analyze the governance systems of Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. They argue that while these nations are celebrated for their ability to adapt to changing circumstances, this very adaptability can lead to overreach and excess. The book is a fascinating exploration of how good intentions in governance can sometimes produce counterproductive results.

One of the book's strongest points is its rigorous methodology. Dahl and Dahlström employ a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis to support their arguments. They draw on a wealth of data, including interviews with policymakers, case studies, and statistical analysis. This robust approach lends credibility to their claims and makes their conclusions all the more compelling.

The authors focus on several key areas where Nordic governance has gone awry. For example, they examine the financial sector's regulation, highlighting how efforts to create a flexible and adaptive regulatory environment have sometimes led to instability and excess risk-taking. Similarly, they scrutinize welfare policies, showing how well-intentioned programs can become bloated and inefficient when not properly checked.

One of the book's most intriguing sections deals with the concept of "adaptive governance." The authors argue that while adaptability is generally seen as a strength, it can become a weakness when it leads to constant policy changes and a lack of long-term stability. This section is particularly relevant in today's fast-changing global landscape, where governments must balance the need for flexibility with the necessity of stability.

Dahl and Dahlström also offer a nuanced view of the Nordic model. They acknowledge its many successes but caution against idealizing it. Their critique is not an outright condemnation but rather a call for a more balanced and critical perspective. They argue that other countries looking to emulate the Nordic model should be aware of its pitfalls and not simply adopt it wholesale.

However, the book is not without its shortcomings. At times, the authors' focus on the negative aspects of adaptability can feel somewhat overstated. While they provide ample evidence to support their claims, a more balanced discussion of the positive aspects of adaptive governance would have enriched the narrative. Additionally, the book's academic tone may make it less accessible to general readers, although those with a keen interest in political economy will find it highly rewarding.

In conclusion, "Good Governance Gone Bad: How Nordic Adaptability Leads to Excess" is a compelling and insightful examination of the complexities of governance in the Nordic countries. Dahl and Dahlström provide a well-researched and thoughtful critique that challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a more nuanced understanding of the Nordic model. This book is a valuable resource for scholars, policymakers, and anyone interested in the intricate dynamics of governance and public policy.

Similar BooksMore